For example, he has a paragraph (the last on page 57, part II) of heretical content and in note 9 (pp. 58-63) he himself writes that this text (this paragraph) is of heretical content, a text containing heretical thoughts and further gives Orthodox teaching! And if he had released a whole collection of heresies?! And with two words mentioned this at the beginning (in the preface, for example). That would be food for the “theologians-quote-checkers,” “exposers” of heresies, who were tasked with discrediting this author, and making him a heretic in the eyes of the world and the church!!! How many contradictions, how many heresies they would find there. And the report (denunciation) at the synod (Sanhedrin) would last all day, probably. And then they would proudly say: “Everything there is heresy!” So the author is a heretic!!! Ban him and his books, as heretical!!! But if the synod were looking for the truth, they would ask the author what it all means, and the author would explain that it is a collection of heresies, and he also condemns heresies, as the synod does, then everything would be fine!!! But when the synod is not interested in the truth, but in protecting the antichrist’s spirit, which they breathe, then the actions and methods are opposite to the church ones (read in the Gospel texts about the trial of Christ – nothing has changed in two thousand years, Satan acts as primitively as then)!!!
But let us remind you once again: Fr. Volodymyr said he does not provide answers but helps (attempts) to raise problems of church life, to ask questions, and seek answers not in books but in the Church, in the Parish-Eucharist! Therefore, when the author writes, as the deceitful reviewer claims, that we partake of nature and then not of nature – he (the author) knows what he is writing, and when he says this (not as the heretic presents it) – he has a purpose that you do not know and do not wish to know (you would have asked the author if you wanted to know the truth!), because your only goal is to defame, slander, and make him a heretic – on the orders of the spiritual “Kremlin” and its leaders.
And you, “theologians” of KPBA, have never read about the language of the church, with which it addresses the catechumens of the last period of catechization – apophatic theology, which was preceded by cataphatic theology?! The author writes about this in Part I. (For example, how does the Church say: God is Love? – Yes! God is Love? – No! God is Light? – Yes! God is Light? – No!). So, do we partake of nature? – Yes! Do we partake of nature? – No! But these simple theological concepts do not fit into heretical minds! Therefore, everything depends on the context and what is being discussed, in what coordinates (e.g., cataphatic or apophatic theology: God is Love (cataphasis) and God is not Love (apophasis); apophasis is not a denial of cataphatic statements but an entirely different nature of theologizing, see Parts I and II). To help the “professors” of KPBA better understand what we are saying, let us give the following example: Does the boogeyman exist? – Yes! – says the mother to the child who does not want to listen to his parents! Does the boogeyman exist? – No! – says the mother to the child when she sees that he does not need this “motivator” for good deeds (to eat porridge, listen to his mother, etc.) and sees that the child is already able to comprehend more truth and reality! But the “professors” of KPBA, who derive all truths from Scripture, still ask the mother: so, does the boogeyman exist or not?! Please make up your mind! What can one say – it remains only to shake one’s head and deeply regret the level of education (intensive darkness) at KPBA! By their fruits, you will know them! I was already going to move on to the next thought, but I thought that these “professors” of KPBA and the elite of the UOC KP are so dark and primitive that they not only cannot deal with the cataphatic and apophatic language of the Church’s theology but will not understand even the boogeyman story, so I decided to explain. At the same time, the mother says to one son: “Ivasyk, the boogeyman exists…”, and to another: “Vasylko, the boogeyman does not exist…”!? Ivasyk is three years old and this little disobedient one does not want to eat porridge or listen to his mother, so the “educator-motivator” boogeyman (and his substitutes, analogs) is an indispensable helper in the pedagogical (educational) “household” (= save with fear, heal)! And Vasylko, who is already twenty and for some reason has such fear that he is afraid of his own shadow (and the boogeyman has been his first enemy since childhood), the mother says that there is no boogeyman, it is a fabrication, so there is no need to be afraid of him or the dark in which he supposedly operates… At the same time (explaining to the “professors” of KPBA, who will say: how can a mother talk to both at once?! This is heresy, it does not happen! Yes, the mother does not have two tongues, so she speaks separately to the younger one so that the older one does not hear, and separately to the older one so that the younger one does not hear! And saying “at the same time” (“on the same page written,” not even in different chapters! Or different books of the author!) – we mean that after finishing the educational conversation with one son, she immediately starts talking with the other!!!) she says one thing to one, and the opposite to the other!!! “Professors” of KPBA, if you still do not understand this, then forgive me, even children in kindergarten understand what I am saying! And to the wise, we wrote in previous books that the main thing is context: who said it? to whom? when? for what purpose? etc. Therefore, without the author and those who have learned from the author, books are not understood (not read), because only the AUTHOR knows what is written in the book!!! Poor “scribes” (writers) – “professors” of KPBA – are unfortunately incapable of understanding this elementary fact!?